skastah je napisal/a: |
Ravno za to gre pri bistvu Wikipedije. Pravila ne dopuščajo nalaganja gradiva, ki ne nudi svobode uporabe v vsak namen ostalim uporabnikom. |
Citiram: |
Therefore, for any text you hold the copyright to, by submitting it, you agree to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
... If you want to import text that you have found elsewhere or that you have co-authored with others, you can only do so if it is available under terms that are compatible with the CC-BY-SA license. |
predlagam vladi je napisal/a: |
Člen v veljavni obliki prepoveduje fotografsko reprodukcijo arhitekturnih in drugih umetniških del, ki stojijo na splošno dostopnih krajih, če se reprodukcija vrši za doseganje gospodarske koristi. Wikipedisti ustvarjamo zbirko gradiva, ki je prosto dostopen vsakomur, v vsak (tudi komercialni) namen, in ima poleg izobraževalne vloge tudi vlogo promocije Slovenije v tujini - Wikipedija je namreč ena najbolj obiskanih spletnih strani na svetu. Pravila ne dopuščajo nalaganje gradiva, ki ne nudi svobode uporabe v vsak namen, zato zakon posredno preprečuje predstavljanje arhitekturnih del, ki so avtorsko še zaščitena (avtorske pravice potečejo 70 let po smrti avtorja), kamor med drugim sodijo vsa Plečnikova dela, Šubičev nebotičnik in praktično vsa sodobna arhitektura. |
skastah je napisal/a: |
Ne razumem čemu tako klobasanje .... če se ne strinjaš klikni proti ali pa ignoriraj. |
kleb je napisal/a: |
Ne, ne moreš vključevat prek citata, če ne moreš zagotoviti tudi uporabnikom wikipedije svobodno uporabo tega citata. To je _bistvo_ wikipedije. |
Wikipedia je napisal/a: |
The following list is not exhaustive but contains the most common cases where non-free images may be used.
1.Cover art: Cover art from various items, for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary). 2.Team and corporate logos: For identification. See Wikipedia:Logos. 3.Stamps and currency: For identification of the stamp or currency, not its subject. 4.Other promotional material: Posters, programs, billboards, ads. For critical commentary. 5.Film and television screen shots: For critical commentary and discussion of the work in question. 6.Screenshots from software products: For critical commentary. 7.Paintings and other works of visual art: For critical commentary, including images illustrative of a particular technique or school. 8.Images with iconic status or historical importance: Iconic or historical images that are themselves the subject of sourced commentary in the article are generally appropriate. Iconic and historical images which are not subject of commentary themselves but significantly aid in illustrating historical events may be used judiciously, but they must meet all aspects of the non-free content criteria, particularly no free alternatives, respect for commercial opportunity, and contextual significance. 9.Images that are themselves subject of commentary. |
Wikipedia je napisal/a: |
Similarly, a photo of a copyrighted statue (assuming there is no freedom of panorama in the country where the statue is) can only be used to discuss the statue itself, not the subject of it.
|
kleb je napisal/a: |
Skratka, bolje bi bilo, če bi ta t.i. "freedom of panorama" imeli, jaz razberem iz tega. |
Citiram: |
Za uporabnike DA, za avtorje teh del pa NE ![]() |